top of page

Bearing-Type vs. Slip-Critical Bolted Connections: Key Differences in Design and Application

  • Negin Amani
  • Nov 26, 2025
  • 4 min read

Updated: Feb 20

Bolted steel connections are crucial in determining how structures respond to various loads, from everyday gravity to wind, vibration, and seismic activity. In Ontario’s industrial and commercial sectors, the choice between Bearing-Type and Slip-Critical connections is more than a matter of preference; it significantly influences structural performance, installation costs, and long-term durability.


Both systems are accepted under CSA S16 (Design of Steel Structures), but they operate differently in service. Understanding where "slip" is acceptable—and where even a few millimetres of movement can jeopardize safety or operations—is vital for effective design.


Understanding Bolted Connections


Bolted steel connections play a central role in how structures behave under load—from everyday gravity forces to wind, vibration, and seismic activity

To the untrained eye, the bolts may appear identical. However, the load transfer mechanism is where the real difference lies:


  • Bearing-Type Connections The bolts are tightened to a "snug-tight" condition. This connection allows for a small amount of slip until the bolt shank physically contacts the side of the hole.


  • Slip-Critical Connections: The bolts are fully pretensioned to create a strong clamping force. The load is transferred solely through friction between the steel surfaces (faying surfaces), preventing any slip under service loads.


Why the Distinction Matters


  1. Serviceability & Alignment: In bearing connections, minor settling is expected. However, for long-span trusses, crane runways, or precise equipment supports, this movement can misalign systems. Slip-critical connections lock the geometry in place.


  2. Fatigue & Vibration: If a structure experiences load reversals (e.g., wind on a tall structure) or vibration (e.g., machinery), a bearing connection may loosen over time or damage the bolt hole (ovalization). Slip-critical connections protect against this fatigue.


  3. Execution & Cost: This is a significant factor for owners and contractors.


  4. Bearing-Type: Fast to install (snug-tight) and requires minimal surface preparation.

  5. Slip-Critical: Significantly more expensive. It requires specific surface preparation (Class A or B friction surfaces), strictly controlled bolt pretensioning (turn-of-nut or calibrated wrench), and rigorous third-party inspection to verify tension.


Typical Applications in Ontario


Bearing-Type vs. Slip-Critical Bolted Connections: Key Differences in Design and Application

Bearing-Type (The Standard Choice)


  • Standard beam-to-column shear tabs.

  • Secondary steel: platforms, stairs, and rooftop dunnage (equipment supports).

  • Light-industrial framing where minor settling is imperceptible.


Slip-Critical (The High-Performance Choice)


  • Crane Runways: Where impact and fatigue are constant.

  • Bracing Members: To ensure the building remains rigid under wind and seismic loads.

  • Oversized/Slotted Holes: If a connection uses oversized holes for installation tolerance, it often requires slip-critical to prevent the bolt from sliding around in the slot.

  • Splices: In long girders where slip would cause visible sagging.


Need help selecting the right bolted connection?





Key Design & Execution Considerations


Successful steel projects require more than just selecting a bolt type; they demand careful execution.


  • Construction Reality (Faying Surfaces): Slip-critical connections rely on friction. This means the steel surfaces (faying surfaces) must be rated as Class A (clean mill scale) or Class B (blast-cleaned or zinc-rich paint). If a contractor mistakenly paints these surfaces with standard primer, the connection loses its friction rating and may fail inspection.


  • The Risk of Overdesign: We often see slip-critical bolts specified "just to be safe." This increases erection costs (due to tensioning labor) and inspection costs without adding structural benefit. We avoid this by isolating slip-critical requirements only to where they are strictly needed.


  • Edge Distance & Tear-Out: For bearing-type connections, the bolt pushes against the steel plate. If the bolt is too close to the edge of the plate, it can cause "tear-out" or plate deformation. We carefully check edge distances to prevent this failure mode.


  • Inspection Protocols: Bearing connections generally only require verification that bolts are "snug-tight." Slip-critical connections, however, require third-party verification of bolt tension, which adds time to the schedule.


Decision Matrix: Bearing vs. Slip-Critical


Design Factor

Bearing-Type

Slip-Critical

Load Transfer

Shear/Bearing on bolt shank

Friction between steel plates

Installation

Snug-Tight

Fully Pretensioned

Surface Prep

Minimal (Standard Shop Primer)

Strict (Masked/Clean or Zinc Silicate)

Vibration/Fatigue

Not Recommended

Strongly Recommended

Oversized Holes

Permitted (restrictions apply)

Preferred for adjustability

Cost

Lower

Higher (Labor + Inspection)

Typical Applications

Shear tabs, stairs, platforms, light framing

Bracing, crane runways, long splices, vibrating equipment


Conclusion: Engineering for Value and Safety


There is no "better" connection—only the correct connection for the application. Over-specifying slip-critical connections wastes budget on unnecessary preparation and inspection. Under-specifying them risks maintenance issues and alignment failure.


At Parsways Inc., we ensure our designs meet CSA S16 requirements while respecting the construction budget. We focus on detailing that is efficient, buildable, and reliable for the lifecycle of the structure.


Final Thoughts on Connection Choices


Selecting the right connection type is essential for the success of any project. It impacts not only the immediate costs but also the long-term performance and safety of the structure. I encourage you to consider all factors, including load requirements, installation conditions, and future maintenance needs, when making your choice.


By understanding the differences between bearing-type and slip-critical connections, we can make informed decisions that enhance the safety and functionality of our structures. This knowledge allows us to build with confidence, knowing we are choosing the best solutions for our projects.


In conclusion, whether you opt for a bearing-type or slip-critical connection, ensure that your choice aligns with the specific demands of your project. This approach will help you achieve optimal performance and durability in your structures.

 
 
bottom of page